Skip to content
Vertexa Studio offers professional web design, development,…

Venezuela May Now Determine President Trump's Political Legacy - as well as America's Position in the Global Order

Following executing a night of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building business.

In a remarkable news conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief stated that US forces had effectively captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a team including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the troubled nation.

"We are going to manage the country until such time as we can do a secure, orderly and careful transition," he said.

What exactly "managing the nation" actually means is uncertain, but the pledge signifies an sudden shift in direction for the president, rife with inconsistencies and significant obstacles.

A leader who ran on opposing "forever wars", who sharply criticised past US attempts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America first" international policy is now gambling his administration on effectively rebuilding a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been undermined by years of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was persistently upbeat.

He stated his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He vowed to enlist American energy companies to rebuild Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, providing financing for the American reconstruction efforts and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has altered Venezuela's prospects – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has shown that he is ready to use armed force internationally.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, suspected drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

In contrast to past actions, which have largely involved rockets and warplanes that reduce the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are notably different.

His goal, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Domestic and International Reaction

That play on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra could be hard for some of Trump's followers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump ally who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his political base, was quick to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's perpetual use of force and support of overseas conflicts is justified because we are compelled to fund it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "firm and warranted".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American foreign policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, land and resources that are core to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "backyard."

Trump's choice to apprehend Maduro will provoke larger questions in international relations, however, and affect American ties with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement voicing shock and condemning what it said was a irresponsible assault on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar censures of Russia after its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, expressed worry about the message Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were sharper.

"The United States should not be managing other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in perpetual conflicts and overthrow attempts that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's choice not to consult with congressional leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with zero American deaths and minimal harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical confidence, portrayed the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most astonishing, effective and impressive demonstrations of American military might and proficiency in US history."

Now he is betting his legacy on that success continuing, as the US claims it will take over administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unclear. He and his team must strengthen a nation that has been in chaos for decades while stabilising a region that is sure to be wary of what Trump's international strategy has in store for them.

MH
By

Ms. Heather Stone

A digital strategist with over 8 years of experience in web development and SEO optimization.

Vertexa Studio

Type to search articles.